> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Fred. > > It's depending your OS. > > Depending your hardware. > > Depending your OS configuration. > > Tuning is very complex problem and tuning is EVIL. > > Remember it. > Yuri. my tests are very very basic I think in this case this is not a matter of tuning, Squid 3.4.13 and squid 3.5.6, same OS, same config, same object downloaded, same cache size, no other user, no lan - directly connected - The only difference is aufs/diskd in squid.conf Result, very slow with 3.5.6 and diskd Top 1 - squid 3.4.13/3.5.6 + aufs -> Fast, but with many users a lot of messages in cache.log, stress me ;) 2 - squid 3.4.13 -> diskd -> more slow 3 - squid 3.5.6 -> diskd -> very slow, unusable ? Maybe my other problem with aufs (warning messages) needs tuning but I don't know what to do exactly. As other Fred, I see that there is something strange, maybe you are right but I'm curious to know what special config (not needed before) I should put, my Internet access - 100 mbps - is, very, more faster than my direct access disk (again there is no other user in my test machine). I hope I will find time to test rock store soon, with and without high load. Please Amos, can you just make a test with the latest version ? Maybe there is something wrong here - and for the other Fred too -, just downloading a "large" file in cache without any other user, with aufs and also diskd ,if you can directly with loopback address. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
