|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Fred. It's depending your OS. Depending your hardware. Depending your OS configuration. Tuning is very complex problem and tuning is EVIL. Remember it. PS. On MY platform diskd is the single choise. And it's very fast. 0.1 sec latency. 16.07.15 21:00, FredB пишет: > >>> >>> Not sure we'll have free time for testing the previous 3.4, we now >>> have >>> dozens of boxes to manually upgrade to the 3.5.6... >>> yes, we do use the original squid 3.5.6 package, no build mix here. >>> >> >> Ok I will, It would be interesting to understand what happen and if >> there is something wrong in latest versions >> _______________________________________________ > > > Hi all, > > Quickly tested with squid 3.5.6, yes there is a big difference > Without any other load, just my test - wget with proxy 127.0.0.1 (no lan) - Debian wheezy 32 bits > > > aufs: > > [16/Jul/2015:16:15:25 +0200] "GET http://ec.ccm2.net/www.commentcamarche.net/download/files/youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe HTTP/1.0" 200 10096328 TCP_HIT:HIER_NONE > > 100%[===========================================================================================================================================================================>] 10,095,849 26.1M/s in 0.4s > > 2015-07-16 16:15:25 (26.1 MB/s) - `youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe.4' saved [10095849/10095849] > > > real 0m0.385s > user 0m0.028s > sys 0m0.164s > > > diskd: > > [16/Jul/2015:16:17:29 +0200] "GET http://ec.ccm2.net/www.commentcamarche.net/download/files/youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe HTTP/1.0" 200 10096328 TCP_HIT:HIER_NONE "Wget/1.13.4 (linux-gnu)" > > > Saving to: `youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe.6' > > 100%[============================================================================================>] 10,095,849 901K/s in 14s > > 2015-07-16 16:17:29 (684 KB/s) - `youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe.6' saved [10095849/10095849] > > > real 0m14.426s > user 0m0.016s > sys 0m0.156s > > In this case it's better without cache. > > I understand that aufs should be better but diskd is unusable ... > > I also found something else, with squid 3.4.13 diskd start the download slowly but after a short time it is fast, with 3.5.6 the download is always slow > In my bench aufs is always faster (very) than diskd, no matter 3.4.3 or 3.5.6, but with high load I'm worried about warning messages in cache.log, diskd seems more stable in this case. > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVp9wcAAoJENNXIZxhPexG5SwH/0tHln3GBuPeCEdZb7vAocMQ K5EVfS1TMqOnsud4CQBrUbzaBDqks016MCYgi/nUqmgGquTpLFi58SRDvnsv7rF1 4sVUeGCzBOAJFa0mwTwigVlTaShesq6kJlCmMEiUu9JDPk/n/+WrJ27GfJIeJ5VT Cs+G6zet9ITvWCklZ8ml1vLX+K72QLoVA7JvbCqHmsxqWlmL82EPSq0+c5vQt8Va jtjVPYFYncofyrgSbMNX7C3hqm8yt1+0+EHGGfT88fOG9Xe3prqbKWrfWmDqWsea PmUdeQvmET2b6j5F5uSLSYjL17hFNl56vP7VuYxJ3lbbqsZfR/ihqF1+dbNjRwk= =joRM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
