May I ask about the setup?
Is this setup of 20 pxy are running in interceot\transparent mode?
Eliezer
On 18/06/2015 06:28, Michael Pelletier wrote:
Which one would be good for capacity\load? I have a very, very large
environment. I have 220,000 users on 8 Gig to the INTERNET. I am running a
load balancer, ipvsadm (Direct Routing) with 20 proxies behind it. I am
interested in handling load.
Michael
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18/06/2015 8:53 a.m., Michael Pelletier wrote:
Hello,
I am looking to had some more power to squid. I have seen two different
types of configurations to do this:
1. Adding workers directive equal to the number of cpus. Then adding a
special wrapper around the AUFS disk cache so that the correct worker can
only access the correct cache. Yes, I know rock is multi cpu capable.
2. Using the split configuration from the Squid Web page. This involved a
front end and multiple backend squid servers on the same server.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/MultiCpuSystem
My question is, which one is recommended? What are the pros and cons of
each?
Both and neither. #1 improves bandwidth savings. #2 improves raw speed.
Pick your poison.
These are example configurations only. For real high performance mutiple
machines in a mix of the two setups is even better.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
