Which one would be good for capacity\load? I have a very, very large environment. I have 220,000 users on 8 Gig to the INTERNET. I am running a load balancer, ipvsadm (Direct Routing) with 20 proxies behind it. I am interested in handling load.
MichaelOn Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Both and neither. #1 improves bandwidth savings. #2 improves raw speed.On 18/06/2015 8:53 a.m., Michael Pelletier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to had some more power to squid. I have seen two different
> types of configurations to do this:
>
> 1. Adding workers directive equal to the number of cpus. Then adding a
> special wrapper around the AUFS disk cache so that the correct worker can
> only access the correct cache. Yes, I know rock is multi cpu capable.
>
> 2. Using the split configuration from the Squid Web page. This involved a
> front end and multiple backend squid servers on the same server.
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/MultiCpuSystem
>
> My question is, which one is recommended? What are the pros and cons of
> each?
>
Pick your poison.
These are example configurations only. For real high performance mutiple
machines in a mix of the two setups is even better.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Disclaimer: Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
