Hi Amos Jeffries:
Thanks again .
because squid 2.7 stable 9 can support coss
for small http object , if i use squid 3.5.2 ,
which part is stable between coss and rock
for operating small http object ?
Whether squid 3.5.2 can support wccp ?
Best Regards
John
于 2015年02月28日 11:42, Amos Jeffries 写道:
On 28/02/2015 4:18 p.m., johnzeng wrote:
Hi all :
i meet a problem ,Squid cannot currently deal with such connections (
non-HTTP connections ) based 80 port , and We get some error ,
Unsupported Request Method and Protocol'' for https URLs..
NOTE: HTTPS never goes over port 80.
HTTPS native port is 443, and when proxied uses the proxy port.
Intercepted HTTPS traffic MUST NOT be delivered to a http_port listening
port in Squid. Use https_port instead.
i search via www.ask.com , but i don't good way .
if possible ,i hope to use squid 2.7 stable9 , Maybe it will be stable version untile now .
Whether we can resolve the problem via other tunnel tools + squid 2.7 ( for example:
http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html ) or
http://desproxy.sourceforge.net <http://desproxy.sourceforge.net/>????
Current stable version is 3.5.2. Please use that.
Particularly if you are intercepting HTTPS traffic. There is an arms
race going on between people trying to use HTTPS for security and people
trying to filter it. Things are changing rapidly.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
