Spam detection software, running on the system "master.squid-cache.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hi, Can squid authenticate to an upstream proxy using digest
? If I saw it right cache_peer allows basic and negotiate only (or passthrough)
Thank you Markus [...]
Content analysis details: (7.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available.
0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=gcwsg-squid-users%40m.gmane.org;ip=81.174.172.105;r=master.squid-cache.org]
0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
domains are different
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES No description available.
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
3.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT To: misformatted and supposed Microsoft tool
--- Begin Message ---
- Subject: Proxy to proxy authentication
- From: "Markus Moeller" <huaraz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:31:21 -0000
- Importance: Normal
Hi,
Can squid authenticate to an upstream proxy using digest ? If I saw it
right cache_peer allows basic and negotiate only (or passthrough)
Thank you
Markus
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
