Ok i fear to waste many time to understand that, but it could be interesting ^^ Thanks for your replies ! 2014-05-15 15:10 GMT-04:00 Alex Crow <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > Welcome to the practically incomprehensible world of QoS on Linux - look up > "LARTC" and then feel the fear! > > It's really powerful but even after 14 years of managing Linux gateways I > still prefer you just use shorewall to take away the complexity - and you > are welcome to call me lazy ;-) > > Alex > > > On 15/05/14 20:04, Antoine Klein wrote: >> >> Ok thanks, it could be a good idea ! >> >> Do you know if we can apply a QoS with the bucket concept of delay >> pool using the Linux QoS Tools ? >> >> 2014-05-15 14:41 GMT-04:00 Leonardo Rodrigues <leolistas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Em 15/05/14 14:59, Antoine Klein escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> I need to install squid to apply a QoS in a private network with the >>>> delay >>>> pool. >>>> In fact, this network offer a public WIFI, so that's not possible to >>>> configure a proxy on clients. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to intercept HTTPS connexion, apply a Delay Pool and >>>> forward the request without decipher the SSL packet ? >>>> >>> I really dont think that's possible. Anyway, you can always use your >>> Linux (or whatever OS you're using) QoS tools to acchieve something >>> similar >>> to delay pools but on NATted connections. You can have squid intercepting >>> TCP/80 connections and apply delay pools, the TCP/443 (and all other >>> indeed) >>> connections can be throttled by QoS SO tools. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Atenciosamente / Sincerily, >>> Leonardo Rodrigues >>> Solutti Tecnologia >>> http://www.solutti.com.br >>> >>> Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email >>> gertrudes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> My SPAMTRAP, do not email it >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Antoine KLEIN
