Search squid archive

Re: squid cache manager question and snmp with smp question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Because your cache is busy and using all the memory you gave it for
> caching objects (cache_mem). This is normal for memory cache, there is
> no reason to hold it lower than 100% since there is no delay in deleting
> things when they need to be..

===========================>well , no worry :)


>> Q2- does the result in cache manager in "general run time information" is
>> calculated as total for all processes ???
> 
> Um. Is cache_mem set to 1000 MB in on worker? or would that be the sum
> for all the workers with cache_mem ?

==>i think memory will be for all workers
i mean if i put to 1000 ===> the given cache_mem to squid is to be
(1000*process number)


>> ==================================================================
>> Q3
>>  ABOUT snmp with smp
>> wt i need to configure in squid.conf ??
> 
> Squid must be built with --enable-snmp.
> 
> Also, snmp_port and snmp_access directives must be configured.
> 
>> 
>> do i need to configure snmp for each instance ???
> 
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#What_can_workers_share.3F

===>well from wiki it say that snmp is shared wit workers , u mean we dont
need to do it  per workers ??




> Drop those last two lines about address. The first one is doing nothing
> useful. The second one will cause failures.

========> ok i will



> From the config manual:
> "
>   NOTE, snmp_incoming_address and snmp_outgoing_address can not have
> 	the same value since they both use the same port.
> "
> 
>> ###############################################
>> 
>> i had results in my mrtg , but not sure of the results ,
>> i got squid mib file  and converted it to oidb file and  put it in m y
>> mrtg
>> .
>> 
>> by here im using smp , not sure from the results 
>> 
>> 
>> i also revived some suspicious logs :
>> 
>> 2013/11/08 16:51:26 kid3| snmpHandleUdp: FD 20 recvfrom: (11) Resource
>> temporarily unavailable
> 
> 
> We are still trying to figure this one out. It seems not to be harmful
> particularly, except a waste of effort somewhere.

=============>well


regards




-----
Dr.x
--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-cache-manager-question-and-snmp-with-smp-question-tp4663233p4663241.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux