Hey there, On 09/04/2013 01:35 PM, Alfredo Rezinovsky wrote: > In the page reccomends reiserfs. So I tried to set up a squid for > 200Mbps squid using reiser and squid 3.3 > Since squid works in L1 and L2 directories the design meant for every FS that has limits which reiser has a limit on your specific setup and maybe some others. > I had a problem, every five to ten minutes, the system freezes and the > bandwith drops to a half for about 10 seconds. If you can send more details on the problem you encountered it will be a benefit while comparing extX to reiser FS. > > I tried tuning squid in many ways. And I noticed reiser flushes the > buffers all at a time, freezing the I/O, I suppose even the network I/O. > The solution was to reformart the cache disks using ext4 (noatime an > so). Now the proxy runs smoothly. Squid cannot do a thing in the kernel land and I/O from my experience should be the OS and not the application level. > > I know there should be a reason for recomending reiser in the 1st place > but I had very bad experience with it. We cannot ask the one that recommended it? or maybe yes? > > Also... I know people leaving linux in favor of BSD to be able to use > zfs. Anyone knows the status and usability of zfs in linux ? Well maybe small groups of people do "leave" or "try" zfs but since enterprise class storage is the real issue and I have not seen yet a BSD vendor like RH I would be happy to see this kind of vendor.. Eliezer > > -- > Alfrenovsky
