On 2/04/2013 10:46 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi. On 02.04.2013 14:30, Amos Jeffries wrote:No, unfortuately nobody is working on that part yet. As a workaround you should be able to retrieve SNMP information per-worker by using ${process_number} in the snmp_port directive to assign each worker a unique port for SNMP contact.Is it worth reporting in the bugzilla ? (Or maby this is a well known planned to fix issue and the report will just add unnecessary escalation ?) For example I can live for now with one worker, even on my most crowded productions. Thanks. Eugene.
We are tracking it on the http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale feature page. I see now that apparently there is something underway - but no mention of it specifically what that is has come through squid-dev yet IIRC.
Amos
