Hi. On 18.01.2013 06:42, Panagiotis Christias wrote: > In both cases, every SNMP adds two or new stale entries (filedescriptors, > sockets or whatever) as reported by lsof: > > # lsof -i -nP | egrep 'PID|:163$' > COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME > squid 5007 squid 15u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163 > squid 5008 squid 15u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163 > squid 5008 squid 19u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163 > squid 5008 squid 41u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163 > (and the list gets longer and longer as our monitoring systems keep > quering squid..). > > Everything (SNMP-related) works correctly when we use just one worker > but currently this is no option since a single squid 3.2 worker seems > to be unable to handle as many requests as squid 2.7 (in our case at > least). > > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. > Yeah, recently I discovered that I have exactly same issue with 3.2.9. Furthermore, I can say that I even have more workers than intended: 22972 ?? S 0:02.92 (squid-2) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid) 23146 ?? S 0:02.44 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid) 23237 ?? S 0:00.74 (squid-coord-3) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid) 31139 ?? R 0:00.11 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid) 31192 ?? R 0:00.01 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid) 31193 ?? R 0:00.00 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid) Some of they don't die after squid -k kill, I have to kill them explicitely with -9. Is that normal ? Right now I decided to switch back to non-SMP. And yeah, I just don't like this situation with thousands of open FDs, wich doesn't happen with one worker. Is this resolved in 3.3.x ? Thanks. Eugene.
