> > Hello, > > After many years with squid as a proxy-cache combined with the proxy.pac > or > WPAD client configurations, we are considering to use squid as a proxy with > interception (WCCP2) on our whole university site. > > The reason essentially lies on complaints from users with their browsers > configurations, but also with applications that can not talk to a proxy... > > We'd like to know if interception is widely used and approved. > Some feedback, good or bad experiences, would be precious for us. > If the first thing a student tries to do on your network is to check their facebook or google something then they will get an error as you can't (or shouldn't for a university network) do interception proxy with HTTPS. A lot of other things are https by default these days too. Maybe put interception proxy in place as a backup, but stick with regular proxy as well. James
