On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:51:03PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > Start thinking straight. If the requests are goint to a parent proxy > there is no normal reason for the 3.1 proxy to be doing DNS anyways. The > DNS problems would be from the 2.7 machine. > > (unless you have configured the 3.1 in such a way that it need to > perform DNS checks to verify something). > OK, but, the 2.7 stable 6 machines that work well share the same parents as the 3.1.15 machines - they even talk to the same DNS servers. -- Brett Lymn "Warning: The information contained in this email and any attached files is confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free, however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to your computer."
