2011/5/4 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 4 May 2011 12:38:43 -0400, Carlos Manuel Trepeu Pupo wrote: >> >> 2011/5/4 Amos Jeffries: >>> >>> On 05/05/11 03:35, Carlos Manuel Trepeu Pupo wrote: >>>> >>>> I tried in previous post to change the established connection when the >>>> time of the delay_pool change. Amos give me 3 solution and now I'm >>>> trying with QoS, but I have this idea: >>>> >>>> If I have 2, 3 or the count of squid.conf that I could need, and with >>>> one script I make squid3 -k reconfigure. That not finish any active >>>> connection and apply the changes, what do you think? >>> >>> It is favoured by some. Has the slight side effect of "forgetting" the >>> delay >>> pool assigned on older Squid versions. >> >> What do you mean about "forget" the delay_pool? > > The reconfigure erases old delay pools config and re-creates it. > As I recall the old code used to leave it at that, with the existing > connections having no delay pool config set. That got fixed a year or two > ago to re-calculate all existing requests delay pools after a configure. > They may get a freshly filled pool suddenly, but stay limited overall. Please, can you explain me better ?. My english played me a bad play and I can't understand at all. Thanks > >>>> >>>> Remember that I have Ubuntu 10.04 with Squid 3 STABLE1. This night >>> >>> 10.04 and "3.0.STABLE1"? dude! >> >> lol I'm now deploying Debian 6, but I don't want to install squid >> until I solved my problems. >> >>> >>>> when my users gone I gonna try !! Tomorrow I tell you, but if someone >>>> tried this, please, send the result, so i can use my time in QoS. >>> >> >> Now I just tried the -k reconfigure, but something strange happen, so >> I backup my squid.conf and in the new one I just put this delay_pool: >> delay_pools 1 >> delay_class 1 1 >> delay_parameters 1 10240/10240 >> delay_access 1 allow all >> >> With this parameters the speed shouldn't be more than 10 KB, but I can >> see in my firewall the proxy reaches speeds until 32 KB, I guess there >> are just peaks, but if I have 100 clients, and all them make these >> peaks, then my DSL will be saturated. > > I'd put that down to STABLE1. Try again with the newer version in Deb 6. > > Amos > >