hello, have something in question that i does not make it clear? Thanks 2011/5/2 igor rocha <igorlogos@xxxxxxxxx> > > hello, > no, this is not the problem, it was a typo, I checked in my file and > it are with -, ie to round-robin . > 2011/5/2 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, 2 May 2011 18:07:53 -0300, igor rocha wrote: > >> > >> See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh: > >> > >> cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin > >> cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin > >> cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin > >> cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin > >> > >> My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the other > >> nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he accumulates > >> more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can make an > >> ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it? > > > > You are missing a "-" in the option name "round-robin". If Squid is ignoring > > them that would drop you back to the default first-available logics which > > acts like you describe. > > hello, > no, this is not the problem, i erred in the hour of the copy, I > checked in my file and it are with -, ie to round-robin . > > > > Amos > > > >
