See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh: cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the other nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he accumulates more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can make an ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it? Thanks! Igor Rafael da Rocha 2011/4/30 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 30/04/11 23:43, igor rocha wrote: >> >> Hello everybody, >> wonder if someone me would one model implementation squid.conf that >> really works with mesh've worked with one configuration from own Squid >> documentation but' there one hierarchy occultly happening because >> directs first for he,one cache particularly of the cluster and always >> fills first this cache someone have some hint ? >> Thanks > > Please outline what you what you are trying to achieve. There are several > very different models called "mesh" and Squid does all of them. > > Amos > -- > Please be using > Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 > Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.7 and 3.1.12.1 >
