On 10/11/10 17:32, david robertson wrote:
I'll file one when I get a chance.
So, back to the original question though - out of those two stats, on
a memory caching only server, which one should be correct? Request
Memory Hit or Request Hit?
Memory hit should be accurate for memory-only caches.
I'm not sure why the basic hit stats are not either non-zero or equal to
memory hits.
Amos
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Amos Jeffries<squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:59:56 -0500, david robertson wrote:
I'm in the process of writing a script to give me some cache hit
statistics for my cluster. There's some confusion on the cache_object
info output, though. For example, this particular host only caches to
memory, however this is the output I get:
Request Hit Ratios: 5min: 40.0%, 60min: 39.2%
Request Memory Hit Ratios: 5min: 69.7%, 60min: 69.6%
For a host that's only caching to memory, there's a pretty large
discrepancy between the two listed above. What's the difference
between the two above?
Thanks in advance.
Squid version? and how did you make it "memory only"?
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:32:57 -0500, david robertson wrote:
Sorry:
Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE9-20101104
The frontend servers only cache to memory, via
cache_dir null /dev/null
Okay. Thats correct, so its possibly a bug of some sort then.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.9
Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.3
