> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:32:51 +0200, Maxim Burgerhout <maxim@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> Of course I just bumped into that little gem *after* I sent the >> previous message to this list... >> >> It has the downside of not being included in, or supported by >> downstream distro's though. The major upside of having Kerberos >> support in Squid's ldap_group helper would be the fact that downstream >> distro's (the Red Hats, Canonicals and Novells of this world) would be >> more likely to support it. But I just checked out the squidkerbldap >> project, and it seems to work ok. The fact it handles the Kerberos >> cache in memory is especially nice. > > ... yet. Markus submitted it for bundling and its just passed our upstream > QA. It hit Squid-3.2 beta bundles under the name > ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl as of a few days ago. Along with a lot of > Kerberos support in other auth-related areas of Squid and associated tools. > > Amos Amos, Re: 3.2 Does this means an NTLM and Kerberos authentication helper wrapped in one..? So no need for two helpers..? Thanks The information contained in this e-mail is of a confidential nature and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than the addressee, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not intended to waive privilege or confidentiality. Internet communications are not secure and therefore Conde Nast does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. The Conde Nast Publications Ltd (No. 226900), Vogue House, Hanover Square, London W1S 1JU
