--- On Wed, 8/11/10, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: how much traffic can squid handle?
> To: "Drunkard Zhang" <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Stand H" <hstandit@xxxxxxxxx>, squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 4:54 PM
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:09 AM,
> Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Drunkard Zhang
> <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>> 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>> Hi!
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Stand H
> <hstandit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- On Mon, 8/9/10, Jose Ildefonso
> Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo
> Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: how
> much traffic can squid handle?
> >>>>>> To: "Drunkard Zhang" <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Cc: "Stand H" <hstandit@xxxxxxxxx>,
> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> Date: Monday, August 9, 2010, 6:26
> PM
> >>>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:18 PM,
> Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > BTW, may bonding of multiple
> NICs helps on too many
> >>>>>> interrupts.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Or maybe just a good NIC, or a
> GOOD NIC + bonding :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you recommend a good NIC?
> >>>>
> >>>> Most Intel have behaved really well with
> me. As for Broadcom: bad
> >>>> luck, I had to disable most of the
> "hardware assistance", and thus:
> >>>> add more load to the server, I'm currently
> on a "avoid Broadcom"
> >>>> policy, but that could change in the
> future (I'll try them again
> >>>> sometime).
> >>>>
> >>> I got bottle on forcedeth shipped with nVidia
> MCP55 chipset, not got
> >>> problem on Intel e1000e yet, but CPU usage on
> Intel cores balanced
> >>> badly. On the other hand CPU time usage on AMD
> Opteron cores balanced
> >>> very good with same configuration, so confuse
> about this.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yeah, e1000 have worked very well for me.
> >>
> >> Ok, so, you saw that CPU usage on Intel tends to
> be "inclined" to one
> >> of the cores? and on AMD it gets more "balanced"?
> >>
> >> Also, are talking about network related load here?
> or just about any
> >> processes running on Intel multi-core and AMD
> multicore.
> >>
> > With same multi-squid-instance configuration, same
> Linux distro, and
> > different hardware, AMD Opteron gets more balanced CPU
> usage, while on
> > Intel Xeon just one CPU core running out, others still
> too idle, about
> > 5%-15%. When that core runs out, simple TCP SYN check
> on service
> > failed occasional.
> >
> > I'm still trying to get this problem resolved...:-(
> Now I'm trying
> > linux-2.6.35 kernel :-).
> >
>
> So, the only logical conclusion is: AMD rules! :) (I
> actually like
> AMD, but I have never faced this kind of problem with Xeon,
> or maybe
> I'm just not paying attention, will make a few test myself,
> and see
> how it ends).
>
> Thanks for your answer!
>
Hi guys,
Since you're talking about multi instances, let me ask you guys a bit more. Currently I'm doing the redirection with wccpv2. squid and router is using a gre tunnel. when we have two squids running, do we need two gre tunnels for each squid? Thank you.
Regards,
Stand
