* Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >* Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >>>3.0.STABLE25 is showing the following behaviour during normal operation: > >>Hi Ralf, > >> Thank you for all this, but I'm wondering why you are putting so > >>much work into 3.0? > > > >3.1 sucks even more? See my other bug reports! That stuff is crashing > >all over the place. Need to get some stability here :) > > :( For me it's more like :(((((((((((((((((((((((((( > >I COULD run 3.2 if you like. > > :) m( okok > >OK, but for such a long time? > > Yes. Depending on the cache size. Some people have reported it taking > IIRC a dozen minutes or more for GB+ caches. > > If I'm reading those graph scales right your time scale was ~20 > minutes before the server maxed out to overload? It didn't max out, it restarted squid > Ah so 99% unknown operations inside Squid. > > The 24K reads + 24K writes equates to (@4KB pages) roughly 6.25Mbps > in IO each way. Assuming that the network traffic takes up a portion > up to ~1/2 thats still a lot of disk IO to sustain. > > Does your cache.log show any indication of a crash leading up to all this? Not really. I usually get mails informing me about a crash with a backtrace and a few lines of log -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx | http://www.charite.de
