Hi! On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:50 AM, David Touzeau <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/05/2010 07:50, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:21 PM, David Touzeau<david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all >>> >>> Currently i have many HTTP uploads problems using DansGuardiand+Squid. >>> I have upgraded to Squid 3.1 but problems still occur. >>> It is not a Squid problem but a Dansguardian problem. >> >> Nice, uploads problems too. Add this to your list: CONNECT problems, >> one example from real live: >> >> One of my clients use Outlook to connect to an external Exchange >> server, and they pass through the proxy, when using Dansguardian >> connection just keep "waiting" all the time, it never finish >> connecting.... if the user connected directly to the squid port: >> everything went just fine. Oh, even more: when I upgraded to latest >> version (2.10.1.1), the CONNECT problem reduced its frequency (to >> "from-time-to-time"), but then: performance went to the floor, the >> network just started to be slower, and slower, and slower, until, >> well: it was obvious that something was wrong, so, I had to disable >> dansguardian for a while (still disabled). >> >> I find it... just annoying. >> >> With SquidGuard, although less maintained that DansGuardian: >> 03-Jan-2009, I never had this kind of problems, I believe because all >> of the protocol thing is done by squid. I want to drop dansguardian, >> but I really need the anti-virus thing :( . I was thinking if >> squidguard could be extended to run AV checks, or maybe use another >> anti-virus proxy (any ideas). >> >>> >>> It seems that Dansguardian is not currently maintain (last build >>> 05-Jun-2009) and mailing list is very silent about this problem. >>> >>> I would like to switch to SquidGuard. >> >> If you don't need the AV proxy: go, switch to SquidGuard. >> >>> Did somebody have some experience using Squid 3.1.x with SquidGuard ? >>> performances, compatibilities with Squid 3.1.x and others ... >> >> I have one question here: how many entries is "ok" on an ACL with >> squid? a blacklist, for example: >> >> acl black_list dstdomain "/etc/squid/black_list" >> >> How many entries is ok to have with squid on the file >> /etc/squid/black_list? >> >> What do you think? >> >> Ildefonso Camargo > > > Many thanks to your answer but i need AV checking, there is no problem for > that because i will use C-ICAP has a ICAP server that allow you to connect > ClamAV with SQUID.... > > > Cool, so, I'll be able to drop dansguardian too :) , I'll take a good look to C-ICAP. Thanks! Ildefonso Camargo