Josh, I have no idea about the specifics you're looking for, but 20-30Mbs of traffic is in the range of what our 2.6 proxy current handles, servicing a 1Gb link for ~650 users. Our peak sustained RPS is about 120. Server is a dual Quad Xeon with 4Gb, and ~300Gb cache. All clients are connected via 100Mbps campus LAN connections. I haven't seen any indication that our server is overworked, aside from log files getting larger each day (some days 2Gb+). -- Shawn Wright http://www.shawnigan.ca ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Baird" <jbaird@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 12:21:25 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: RE: Performance (RPS) on 2.7 FWIW, I'm talking about 20-30Mbit of traffic. Josh -----Original Message----- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 2:16 PM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Performance (RPS) on 2.7 Baird, Josh wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for some roundabout requests/second expectations for a Squid > 2.7 machine (Modern quad core, 8+GB RAM, RHEL 5.4 x64) with all caching > disabled. I will not be caching any requests coming into the Squid > server (no cache_dirs, etc). All of the baseline stats that I can find > seem to indicate that the servers are caching. > > I can provide more data if needed. > > Any ideas? Take the published stats and divide by ten. Network fetches are about 10x-15x slower than local disk fetches. Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE23 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.16
