I dont think it is meant for caching, i intent to use it for transparent proxying and setting up allowed list of https sites. Could somebdy englighten us? Thanks On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Ritter, Nicholas <Nicholas.Ritter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not positive, but pretty sure that SSLBump is not supported with transparent caching. If it is, I would love to make use of it as well. > > Nick > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitri Syuoul [mailto:dsyuoul@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sat 1/16/2010 5:30 PM > To: squid-users > Subject: Re: SSBump.. could it be used for transparent proxying? > > Hello, > > I submitted the response below but for some reason nobody appears to > have commented on this. Is this feature still in beta mode that there > isnt much doc about it? > > Thank you > > Dimitri > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Dimitri Syuoul <dsyuoul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Ive been reading over this new feature. It is unclear to me if this >> can be used for transparently proxying SSL (by this I mean not >> configuring any proxy in the computers of the clients.. it is ok if >> clients get cert warnings). >> >> Thank you. >> Dimitri >> > > >
