On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:20 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > Nice ideas. The range support AFAIK has always been stuck up on > detail > of storing ranges. Not really, its been blocked on having the internals clear enough that someone writing a range capable store doesn't have to mess around with clientside ;). Thats actually pretty close to done; so if I were working on caching ranges today, I'd start with the store and see if I could do what Vary support does there. -Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
