Search squid archive

Re: Best Configuration for sibling peer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Bowe wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Kris [mailto:christian@xxxxxxxxx]

Hi Kris

2. TCP Connection Failed

Are you running iptables?
If so, is the conntrack table overflowing?

my peer config
# cache_peer 10.10.10.10 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
no-delay round-robin proxy-only
cache_peer 10.10.10.11 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
no-delay round-robin proxy-only
cache_peer 10.10.10.12 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
no-delay round-robin proxy-only
cache_peer 10.10.10.13 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
no-delay round-robin proxy-only

any suggestion what best configuration for sibling peer ?

I'm not sure the above is going to give you good results.

Enabling digest would save a lot of ICP traffic / lookups

As pointed out by Chris, "round-robin" option is used with parent selection
in the absence of ICP. But in your case you are using peers with ICP.
If you are trying to prevent overlapping disk objects between the siblings
then I reckon your syntax should just be something like this :

cache_peer 10.10.10.1x sibling 3128 3130 proxy-only

Michael.


i`m not use any iptables.

about proxy-only lines, isnt it good to disable proxy-only ? so the proxy dont need to take same cache in sibling, it will save icp request right ?

another question what ms should i use for these line ?

icp_query_timeout 2000
maximum_icp_query_timeout 2000


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux