Leonardo Carneiro wrote:
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz escreveu:
Le mardi 11 août 2009 12:33:26, Leonardo Carneiro a écrit :
Hello everyone,
Sometime ago i blocked some popular social network sites. However, some
users manage to access those sites using sites like atunnel and others.
Since blocking every single proxy site on the web is a invencible task,
i chose to teach the users a little funny lesson, like redirecting then
to durty porn site in front of the others when they tried to access a
known forbidden site, before sending then serious notifications, and
stuff like that.
Researching about how to do that, i just created a acl selecting those
sites, and my failure url is a html file with a javascript code that
sends to another site:
<!--
To change this template, choose Tools | Templates
and open the template in the editor.
-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<script>
window.location = "<some_site>";
</script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
Since rewriter/redirector looked to complicated to me at the time, and
this was a very efficient solution, i leaved in that way.
The question is: what i'm missing using a "dumb" solucion like this one
instead of the rewriter/redirector?
you should write you own redirector
I wrote on in perl:
http://pastebin.com/f42ca3ef4
read code and enjoy
I keep listening this, but i just wanna know why. What a redirector has
that this simple html file doesn't?
Nothing. And both of them are even worse than simply adding the URL of
the trick site itself to a deny_info line in squid.conf.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13
