Originally Posted by linuxlover.chaitanya View Post I have got no idea why people are forcing on huge RAM for squid. If you are not running graphical then 2gb is gotta be enough for you. But it will also depend on how much clients you are going to serve. Earlier I had a running squid on a old p3 machine with 512megs ram serving about 40 clients without any issues or bandwidth or speed lag. Now I have upgraded the machine to a pentium dual core with 1 gig of ram. And obviously do not run gnome or kde but it keeps more than 50% of ram free. I suppose it depends on how squid is used. If squid is used as a simple proxy just relaying connections without storing much of the data for caching does it need much disk space? I mean if you need: Quote: Thus, a system with 512 MB of RAM can support a 16-GB disk cache. Your mileage may vary, of course. Most servers are in the region of 160Gb+, this would be an extraordinary amount or RAM needed. Can squid limit bandwidth for each user? The line I have can support up to 100Mbits so that's a fair whack. Each user might only need 1Mbps each. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-much-RAM-for-squid-proxy-tp24698323p24770942.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
