Jamie Tufnell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Amos Jeffries<squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:22:25 +1000, Jamie Tufnell <diesql@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We are talking files up-to-1GB in size here. Taking that into
consideration, would you still recommend this architecture?
Yes, the architecture itself is sound.
OK cool. Thanks again for the responses.
I just have one more question relating to this architecture that I am
having trouble finding in the archives or on Google, possibly because
I don't know exactly what to search for...
If a client requests a large file and it's not in the cache, does
Squid have the ability to start delivering the file before it has
fully retrieved it from the origin?
Yes.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE16
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.9
