On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Amos Jeffries<squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:22:25 +1000, Jamie Tufnell <diesql@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> We are talking files up-to-1GB in size here. Taking that into >> consideration, would you still recommend this architecture? > > Yes, the architecture itself is sound. OK cool. Thanks again for the responses. I just have one more question relating to this architecture that I am having trouble finding in the archives or on Google, possibly because I don't know exactly what to search for... If a client requests a large file and it's not in the cache, does Squid have the ability to start delivering the file before it has fully retrieved it from the origin? J
