Search squid archive

Re: Squid Scalability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maximum number of users is not a very good indicator of measuring squid performance. I think, it makes more sense on finding out the maximum req/sec that a box can handle, keeping the service timers within reasonable limits.

And, looking a your stats once again, I think you need to upgrade to 64-bit of your OS to properly use the full 8GB RAM.

Regards
HASSAN



----- Original Message ----- From: "Gavin McCullagh" <gavin.mccullagh@xxxxxx>
To: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 04:20
Subject: Re:  Squid Scalability


Hi,

On Sun, 05 Apr 2009, Gavin McCullagh wrote:

Here's our current situation:

--------------------------------------------------------
Version: 2.6.STABLE18 (Ubuntu Hardy Package)
OS: 32-Bit Ubuntu GNU/Linux (Hardy)
CPU: Dual Core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU  3050  @ 2.13GHz
RAM: 8GB
HDD: 2x SATA disks (150GB, 1TB)
Cache: 1x 600GB
Users: ~3000
RPS: 130
Hit Ratio: 35-40%
Byte Hit Ratio: ~13%

On re-reading this whole page, I realise how to estimate the number of
users. I've started graphing the number of cache clients and it looks like
1200 is a better guess.

Gavin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux