Quin Guin wrote:
Hi Amos,
I am willing to supply benchmarking data for 6 different deployments configured as forward proxies on a regular basis. Where should I submit the records and currently we are using 2.7, 2.6 and I should be able to get some 3.x data as well?
I'd prefer if the benchmarks added to the benchmarking page all used the
same collection/calculation method :). It's listed on the page there,
so you can check your method compares to the rest of the data before adding.
Any other info you care to send will need to go to squid-dev (don't mind
the moderation message, its only a once-off approval for anti-spam measure).
Amos
Thanks,
Quin
--- On Fri, 4/3/09, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Squid Scalability
To: "Sunny Bhatheja" <opensource.linux4e@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 10:06 AM
Sunny Bhatheja wrote:
Hi,
I have the following configuration
of my Hardware. So can any one suggest me that how much I
can scale my Squid in terms of users.
1) Sun Fire system
x4450
2) Quad Cord
3) 64 GB RAM
4) 146x4 GB HDD
I am using squid 2.6 STABLE4 that is bundled with RHEL
5.2
Despite many years of asking, few people have ever supplied
the squid project with relevant benchmarking info. We depend
on volunteers so there are no hard numbers available
publicly yet.
req/sec scales into thousands on modern hardware. It
depends on what modes you run squid as (forward/reverse have
vastly different maximums), how high the hit-ratios are and
how many req/sec each user makes.
To scale higher you will need a newer Squid than
2.6.stable6.
Amos
-- Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6
