Hi, Junyong and Amos On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not at all. I wish you can succeed. And please share your expirence > for me. I could build it ! thank you. (Squid 3.1, Linux Kernel 2.6.28, iptables 1.4.3rc1) Now, I'm researching more detail. > hmm, functionality is the same I thought.. setup and requirements > are very different. > > 2.7 has the old Tproxy v2.2 (cttproxy) which has may online how-tos, > but is officially obsolete. > > 3.1 has TProxy v4.1+ which is new and not much help around yet, on > the whole IMO it's easier, what we have is detailed (with some DL > links) at: The above is well-formed and clear ! I could understand the current status of tproxy. > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4 In the document, the following configuration is missing, right ? ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100 Sincerely, --mkishi Hi, Junyong and Amos On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not at all. I wish you can succeed. And please share your expirence > for me. I could build it ! thank you. (Squid 3.1, Linux Kernel 2.6.28, iptables 1.4.3rc1) Now, I'm researching more detail. > hmm, functionality is the same I thought.. setup and requirements > are very different. > > 2.7 has the old Tproxy v2.2 (cttproxy) which has may online how-tos, > but is officially obsolete. > > 3.1 has TProxy v4.1+ which is new and not much help around yet, on > the whole IMO it's easier, what we have is detailed (with some DL > links) at: The above is well-formed and clear ! I could understand the current status of tproxy. > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4 In the document, the following configuration is missing, right ? ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100 Sincerely, --mkishi
