Search squid archive

Content filtering, password-bypass & client configuration.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi there,

I have a small office at which the bosses want to restrict access to certain sites. I'm new to Squid - if I understand correctly then Squid does the proxying stuff and then I add squidGuard on top to do the filtering?

I haven't even got as far as the proxying, yet, though, because I'm not sure the best way to get things up.

The bosses want these sites blocked, but they also want to be able to log in & use a password to bypass the restriction themselves.

Am I understanding correctly that they can't do this (proxy_auth?) if Squid is running in transparent / invisible mode?

Because transparent / invisible mode seems the ideal solution if you want to *force* employees to use the proxy. Without that option I'm in a bit of a muddle as to the best way to .... hmmmn.... well, configure the clients, I guess, basically.

With transparency, the machine has two NICs and everything goes through it, right? But if it's not transparent then it's just another IP on the LAN (??) and that has to be entered into Internet Explorer's configuration options. I can block outgoing connections to port 80 (except those made by the Squid box) at the ADSL router, and because all the PCs are in a Windows domain I can use Policies to set that on all clients. However this stitches up 2 or 3 laptop users - if I force them to proxy through 192.168.4.2 then they won't be able to surf the net when they take their laptops home (where there is no proxy at that address).

I can make the client proxy configuration a manual process - or allow certain users to override it - but that just seems clumsy to me, having these poor folks who don't know anything about computers messing around in Control Panel twice a day to tick & untick the proxy options. I find that kinda inelegant - the idea of it just bugs me.

I'd prefer not to have the "bypassing" of the block list done by IP, mostly because the bosses have mentioned the use of passwords. They anticipate the work-related sites as being accessible without a password, and only to be prompted for one when they go to facebook or sports-scores.com. I'm not sure if this is possible with Squid(guard)? I get the impression it might be necessary to log on before browsing ANY site if authentication is enabled? Having to log on to use the internet at the beginning of the work day would be seen as a bit intrusive, I think - I think the bosses see the password thing as a disincentive to them themselves to slack off. And if they go through the proxy then the slacking off is logged and each boss can monitor the other's slacking.

Clearly some of my concerns are Windows related, and halfway through writing this I thought maybe I should have addressed my concerns to the Microsoft newsgroups instead. But this must be a well-trodden path in Squid administration, so perhaps you may have some pointers? If it's not possible to do what I expect of Squid / squidGuard then please feel free to offer alternative suggestions - of either proxy / content-filter, or just other ways of using Squid.

Thanks for reading and thanks in advance for any suggestions,

Stroller.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux