Search squid archive

Re: round robin question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:51:00AM -0400, jeff donovan wrote:
> 
> On Sep 24, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Kinkie wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:16 PM, jeff donovan  
> ><donovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>greetings
> >>
> >>How could I go about load balancing two or more transparent proxy  
> >>squid servers ?
> >>No caching invloved. This is strictly for access.
> >>
> >>i thought about dns round robin, but that didn't make sense since i  
> >>am forwarding all connections to a single interface.
> >>
> >>any insight would be helpful
> >
> >
> >So both instances are running on the same (bridging?) system?
> >Can you give some more details?
> 
> I have 12 subnets coming off router 1 and 12 coming off router 2 each  
> pass through a transparent squid.
> 
> I want to for better or worse " Mux " these two and add a 3rd box.
> 
> combine the 24 subnets ---> ( 3 squids ) --->

What is the reason for combining them?  What do you mean by a single
"interface"?  What data rates are you talking about at each point?

I've seen squid load balancing done 3 ways: round-robin dns, a "blade"
in a Cisco switch, and on 2 systems running LinuxVirtualServer in
combination with linux-ha.

- Dave

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux