On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:14 +0200, Altrock, Jens wrote: > So there is no significant change in features, only in programming > language, is that right? What feature changes are significant depends on your environment. For example, Squid 3.0 has decent ICAP support while nobody I know supports ICAP patches for Squid2. Squid 3.1 has more unique features on the map, including SslBump, IPv6, and eCAP. Squid2, in turn has features missing from Squid3 (most of which are being ported). Also, features and language are not the only comparison points. The two versions may differ in the amount and quality of support you are able to receive or the effort it takes to implement something new. Upgrade path and cost is also important for some. All this depends on your specific needs and environment. HTH, Alex. > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jeff Peng [mailto:jeffpeng@xxxxxxx] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 12:09 > An: Altrock, Jens > Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: Re: Differences between Squid 2.7 and 3.0 > > Altrock, Jens 写道: > > Hi there, > > > > Looked for a while, but haven't found something useful thouzgh about the > > differences; is there anything really relevant? Would be nice if someone > > could help me :-) > > > > Regards > > > > Jens > > > > > from what I checked, 3.0 was re-written by C++, 2.7 was inherited from > the traditional 2.6 versions and was by C language.
