Linda W wrote:
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
probably the problem reported is chunked-encoding related. Please
check:
http://squidproxy.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/chunked-decoding/
Blog entry
"http://squidproxy.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/chunked-decoding/"; posted on
April 29, 2008 at 2:24pm says:
[ The 3.0 code is just different enough that it would need a whole
new ]
[ back-port project to get it going well. The time and work that
would ]
[ take is being used instead to get 3.1 out faster. Which should
be ]
[ within a month of this writing so procrastinating could solve
the ]
[ problem for
you. ]
---
Curious -- how's 3.1 progressing?...or about how much of
the month of work has been completed?
(I'm presuming "within a month" figure you gave was probably
an estimation of work left divided by percentage of work time(WT) devoted
to the project --and-- that non-project related demands increased
(reducing percentage of 'WT' available to spend on the SQ3.1 project,
effectively multiplying the time), --or-- unforeseen or unexpected
complexities (or 'gotchas'? :-)) arose, creating more work than initially
planned when giving estimate.)
Seems like software always expands to exceed the available
time allocated for doing it....*ouch*... That trend will likely
continue or get 'worse', as the software 'universe' expands and newer
software relies on more layers of software that will have
come before.
Hmmm...reminds me of the accelerating expansion of the
universe that some posit will eventually result in 'the big rip'...
lets hope software doesn't mirror that theory...:-)
Sorry the timetable has slipped a little. We are down to 15 bugs and 4
'features' (well underway). Things have gone slightly quiet these last
few weeks. Hopefully that means more code done and tested ;-)
A pre-release is due out after those features are merged.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE1 or 3.0.STABLE6
