Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
probably the problem reported is chunked-encoding related. Please check: http://squidproxy.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/chunked-decoding/
Blog entry "http://squidproxy.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/chunked-decoding/"; posted on April 29, 2008 at 2:24pm says:
[ The 3.0 code is just different enough that it would need a whole new ] [ back-port project to get it going well. The time and work that would ] [ take is being used instead to get 3.1 out faster. Which should be ] [ within a month of this writing so procrastinating could solve the ] [ problem for you. ] --- Curious -- how's 3.1 progressing?...or about how much of the month of work has been completed? (I'm presuming "within a month" figure you gave was probably an estimation of work left divided by percentage of work time(WT) devoted to the project --and-- that non-project related demands increased (reducing percentage of 'WT' available to spend on the SQ3.1 project, effectively multiplying the time), --or-- unforeseen or unexpected complexities (or 'gotchas'? :-)) arose, creating more work than initially planned when giving estimate.) Seems like software always expands to exceed the available time allocated for doing it....*ouch*... That trend will likely continue or get 'worse', as the software 'universe' expands and newer software relies on more layers of software that will have come before. Hmmm...reminds me of the accelerating expansion of the universe that some posit will eventually result in 'the big rip'... lets hope software doesn't mirror that theory...:-)
