Search squid archive

Re: Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Michael Puckett wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> >A killer app for -3 would be multi-core support (and the perf 
> >advantages that it would bring), or something else that the 
> >re-architecture makes possible that isn't easy in -2. AIUI, though, 
> >that isn't the case; i.e., -3 doesn't make this significantly easier. 
> Absolutely THE killer app for either -2 or -3. The fact that multi-core 
> processors are now the defacto standard in any box makes this more 
> important by the day IMHO. Being able to do sustained IO across multiple 
> Gb NICs will absolutely require it. This is the single biggest 
> performance enhancement that could be implemented. So where does 
> multi-core support fall on either roadmap?

12 months away on my draft Squid-2 roadmap, if there was enough commercial
interest. Thing is, the Squid internals are very horrible for SMP (both 2 and 3)
and the list of stuff that I've put into the squid-2 roadmap is what I think
is the minimum amount of work required before really starting to take advantage
of multiple cores.




Adrian

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux