Henrik Nordstrom disse na ultima mensagem: > > It means it's the first time we have heard of this problem. > > And yes, I don't care much for diskd. Never have. My main focus is on > aufs and ufs. But how swap.state is maintained should be the same in all > three "ufs" based cache_dir types. And with current FreeBSDs also fully > capable of using aufs... > that is too sad to hear ... capable is one thing but the fast thing is what diskd is, especially on smp machines anyway, I wonder, why then the swap.state problem does not appear when using ufs. On FreeBSD you can tear off the powercable twice and trice and squid with ufs cache_dir comes up fine after fsck corrected the errors - but - diskd goes wild it is clearly a diskd isolated problem since the cache_dir and swap.state are the same for both, so I guess it has nothing to do with the swap.state file it is only wrongly rebuild when running diskd Michel ... **************************************************** Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais. ****************************************************
