Search squid archive

Re: 2.6-S13 + diskd is freaky bugged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sön 2007-06-17 klockan 13:12 -0300 skrev Michel Santos:

> you say so but diff counts 111+/90- on store_dir_diskd.c and 50+/22- on
> store_io_diskd.c between 2.5.S14-20060721 and 2.6.S13 but "not much" is
> pretty relative

In the area of how swap.state is maintained.

> > Should not happen, and have not heard of it happening from anyone else.
> 
> first part I agree but hum :)
> I am not sure if this means not true until someone else calls it or not
> true coming from me ... either way, strange answer, does it mean you don't
>  care and I'm on my own with this?

It means it's the first time we have heard of this problem.

And yes, I don't care much for diskd. Never have. My main focus is on
aufs and ufs. But how swap.state is maintained should be the same in all
three "ufs" based cache_dir types. And with current FreeBSDs also fully
capable of using aufs...

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux