sön 2007-06-17 klockan 13:12 -0300 skrev Michel Santos: > you say so but diff counts 111+/90- on store_dir_diskd.c and 50+/22- on > store_io_diskd.c between 2.5.S14-20060721 and 2.6.S13 but "not much" is > pretty relative In the area of how swap.state is maintained. > > Should not happen, and have not heard of it happening from anyone else. > > first part I agree but hum :) > I am not sure if this means not true until someone else calls it or not > true coming from me ... either way, strange answer, does it mean you don't > care and I'm on my own with this? It means it's the first time we have heard of this problem. And yes, I don't care much for diskd. Never have. My main focus is on aufs and ufs. But how swap.state is maintained should be the same in all three "ufs" based cache_dir types. And with current FreeBSDs also fully capable of using aufs... Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
