mån 2007-06-11 klockan 00:34 +0500 skrev rihad: > Previously we used the heap LFUDA policy instead, at which time 1150 MB > process size limit was enough to handle a 50 GB cache_dir + 256 MB > cache_mem. But now 1500 MB process size is not enough to handle exactly > 500 MB cache_mem with heap GDSF. Af first sight a 350MB increase in > process size would be plenty to cover the 244MB increase of cache_mem. > But if you take our 4,5 million cached objects with GDSF into account > (as opposed to a little over 3 million with LFUDA) one can see why Squid > now requires more memory than expected. Am I right in this reasoning? Yes, more cached objects means higher memory usage. Quite linearly so if you deduct the cache_mem. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
