The tricky part of doing that, I think, is that to make this useful
(e.g., to a reverse proxy), it'd be necessary to share invalidations
between cache peers, which I think would require an extension to ICP.
On 2006/10/20, at 2:38 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tor 2006-10-19 klockan 17:19 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham:
Overall, caching POST responses would be nice. If I were
prioritising, however, I'd be much more excited about getting Squid
conformant to section 13.10 (invalidations from side effects).
Fully argreed.
Regards
Henrik
--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
