lör 2006-10-14 klockan 10:03 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham: > Note that when POST is cached, it's future GETs that will get the > cached response, not POSTs (which will be forwarded to the origin). Are you sure this is what the RFC means? Doesn't make much sense given the function of POST. I don't see how a GET can be considered equivalent to a POST. I thougt the statement allowing caching of POST responses under specific conditions is mainly to allow caching of permanent error responses such as 404 or 410 allowing the server to say "please don't POST to this URI again..". Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
