tis 2006-09-12 klockan 17:16 +0300 skrev Anton Glinkov: > when using aufs the store rebuilding is done MUCH faster compared to > diskd. But when using diskd, once the store is rebuilt the load average is > always lower than 1. With aufs it is usually above 2. And? It's quite natural given what "load average" represents (number of processes/threads in RUN or IOWAIT state).. For your own sanity it's best to ignore that metric as it's rarely of any use. > The CPU time is done mostly by iowait. Good. What aufs is there for absorbing. > So which one should i use? aufs. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
