On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 14:17 +0430, nima sadeghian wrote: > but 172.x.x.x and 172.x.x1.x2 are webservers not cache server. cache > peer is ok for this? Yes, since 2.6. If you want to do this in 2.5 then search the archives. Have posted many times how to accelerated any number of sites in 2.5. Regards Henrik
