> >don't raid0/raid5 your cache disks. squid has more cache-disks > >functionality that's better (faster and more secure) than raid0, and > >raid5 KILLS I/O performance. On 29.06.06 12:42, Chris Robertson wrote: > And RAID1 is not optimal (I hesitate to say "bad") for writes. > Besides, cached data is very transient, and doesn't need the security > that RAID1 provides. Hence, don't bother with RAID for cache disks... :o) RAID1 is fast for reads, so the more hits you have, the more it helps :) RAID1 is safe against disk outages (if you care about data in your cache). => RAID1 is OK in some cases, others are not. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
