Search squid archive

Re: Caching large amounts of images...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >don't raid0/raid5 your cache disks. squid has more cache-disks
> >functionality that's better (faster and more secure) than raid0, and
> >raid5 KILLS I/O performance.

On 29.06.06 12:42, Chris Robertson wrote:
> And RAID1 is not optimal (I hesitate to say "bad")  for writes.  
> Besides, cached data is very transient, and doesn't need the security 
> that RAID1 provides.  Hence, don't bother with RAID for cache disks... :o)

RAID1 is fast for reads, so the more hits you have, the more it helps :)
RAID1 is safe against disk outages (if you care about data in your cache).
=>
RAID1 is OK in some cases, others are not.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool. 

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux