fre 2006-06-30 klockan 12:15 +0200 skrev Constant, Benjamin: > Is this cafile= option already implemented on this 2.6RC2 or am I doing > something wrong? Documentation error.. the option is named sslcafile= Fixing this now. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
