fre 2006-05-05 klockan 13:45 +0200 skrev Tomasz Marciniak: > First: reality check - is it possible to use single (for start) Squid as > acceleration cache for multiple webservers, each one having multiple > virtual hosts in an architecture like that: Yes, as long as each site can be identified by Squid.. > Each of webservers has some number of apaches with virtual hosts or > java-based web applications operating on HTTP. As long as they are speaking HTTP there is no problem. > http_port 80 vport Hmm.. not entirely OK. See the http_port description again. From your description it sounds like you should be using vhost, and perhaps a defaultsite as well. vport -> IP based virtual servers vhost -> domain based virtual servers > redirect_rewrites_host_header off Don't use redirectors if you don't need to. > http_access allow all Normally an accelerator/reverse proxy should only allow access to the sites it acts as an accelerator for.. > cache_peer webserver1.internal parent 80 0 > no-query originserver name=webserver1 Ok. > cache_peer_access webserver1 allow all > cache_peer_domain webserver1 webserver1.external.com Either use cache_peer_access or cache_peer_domain. Mixing the two can be a bit confusing.. (but works..) > While trying to retrieve the URL: http://<private_ip_of_squid>/ > > The following error was encountered: > > * Unable to forward this request at this time. Makes sense. See above. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
