Search squid archive

Re: Disk performance basics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30 Mar 2006 at 18:42, John Horne wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 20:34 -0300, Rodrigo A B Freire wrote:
> >     Shawn,
> > 
> >     Undo the RAID5 and leave them as single disks. Format the disks with 
> > XFS. 
> >
> So you would use XFS rather than reiserfs?
> 
> When you create the XFS disk partitions do you use any special options
> or any special options when you mount the partition? (For reiserfs it
> was recommended to use the notail,noatime mount options.)

Just 'noatime' for us; notail is specific to reiser.
I don't recall using any special options when creating them.

We did extensive performance tests when moving to samba (from NT4) several 
years ago, and compared ext2, ext3, reiser and xfs. XFS was the clear winner, 
and the fact that xfs also had the best support for quotas, ACLs, and EAs at the 
time was also a factor. Granted, samba is lot different from squid, but xfs seems 
to work pretty well all around. 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
http://www.sls.bc.ca
swright@xxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux