Hi Peter, Also sprach Peter Smith <peter.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:10:05 -0600): > Richard, I was wondering if you've gotten anywhere with this? I did > some testing on my fairly busy squid cache.. Here are the results, > from Squid's perspective (access.log).. oh, I did, have a look at.. http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200601/0353.html Well, _I_ made a bobo. I only tested aufs with 2.5STABLE6(or9?). The aufs slowdown seems to be no more in 2.5STABLE12, while diskd gave and still gives me ~256K/s throughput. This behavior was explained by Henrik in.. http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200601/0338.html I'm on aufs now even though Commited Memory raised (due to posix threads, I assume) to over 550M on this 256M box. Didn't hurt at all yet and a cached file comes with blasting ~7,3M/s to local clients and a bit more to localhost. I'm _perfectly_ OK with this. :) > [...] > Peter sl ritch
